A student of Kabbalah opens two books. One uses “Daath,” the other “Daat.” The same Hebrew letters appear in both: dalet, ayin, tav — דעת. One text describes it as the eleventh sephirah, hidden in the abyss. The other calls it the “knowledge” that unites the three upper sephirot. The difference is not in the thing itself but in who translated it, when, and why.
Daath and Daat are both transliterations of the Hebrew Da’at (דעת), meaning “knowledge.” In the Kabbalistic Tree of Life, it is the hidden sephirah that bridges the supernal triad (Keter, Chokmah, Binah) and the seven lower sephirot, and its spelling tells you which tradition you are reading: “Daath” belongs to the Hermetic Qabalah of the Golden Dawn and its heirs; “Daat” follows the conventions of modern academic Hebrew and Jewish Kabbalah.
Where the Two Spellings Come From

The Hebrew word da’at appears in the Bible as a common noun — “knowledge” in the sense of intimate understanding, not mere information. In Proverbs 1:7, “The fear of Yahweh is the beginning of knowledge” uses this same root. The Kabbalists of the 13th century, especially the authors of the Zohar, began to treat da’at as a special sephirah, though the Zohar does not list it among the ten. The classical ten sephirot are fixed: Keter, Chokmah, Binah, Chesed, Gevurah, Tiferet, Netzach, Hod, Yesod, Malkuth. Where, then, does Da’at belong?
The answer came in the 16th century with Isaac Luria (1534–1572), the great Kabbalist of Safed. Luria taught that the sephirot are arranged in three columns and that the three upper sephirot — Keter, Chokmah, Binah, form a triad that is mirrored in the lower sephirot. Da’at is the point where the three upper sephirot converge, the “knowledge” that flows from their union. It is not a separate sephirah but the cognitive faculty that makes the supernal world accessible to the human soul. In classical Jewish Kabbalah, Da’at is often described as the “hidden” sephirah, appearing only when the Tree is depicted in a certain way, or as the eleventh where the path from Keter to Tiferet passes through the Abyss.
The spelling “Daath” entered English through the work of S.L. MacGregor Mathers, a co-founder of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Mathers translated the Zohar and other Kabbalistic texts in the late 19th century, but he did not hew to modern transliteration standards. He wrote “Daath” (with a terminal th), a relic of his effort to render the Hebrew tav as th, a convention from biblical transliteration that also gave us “Beth” for Bet, “Shin” for Shin, etc. Aleister Crowley, a former Golden Dawn member, adopted Mathers’ spelling in his own works, including 777 and The Book of Thoth. Because Crowley’s texts became foundational for 20th-century Western esotericism, the “Daath” spelling spread through Thelema, ceremonial magic, and the chaos magic scene.
The spelling “Daat” is more recent and more faithful to modern academic transliteration, where the tav is rendered as t and the ayin is often omitted or represented by an apostrophe (Da’at). This spelling appears in the works of Gershom Scholem, the pioneering scholar of Jewish mysticism, and in most contemporary English-language books on Kabbalah written from a Jewish or academic perspective. When you see “Daat,” you are likely reading a text that respects the original Hebrew pronunciation and the Jewish tradition rather than the Hermetic offshoot.
The difference in spelling corresponds to a difference in emphasis. In Jewish Kabbalah, Da’at is not a sephirah in the sense of a vessel or divine attribute. It is the cognitive faculty that integrates the three upper sephirot. The Tikkunei Zohar says that Da’at is the “key that locks and unlocks”, it is the point where the influx from Keter, the wisdom of Chokmah, and the understanding of Binah become knowledge that can be used. Without Da’at, the upper three remain abstract, disconnected from the world of action.
In Hermetic Qabalah, Daath (as they spell it) is treated as a separate sephirah, often called the “invisible sephirah” or the “sephirah of the Abyss.” It is placed on the central pillar between Keter and Tiferet, at the boundary of the Abyss (the region of nothingness that separates the supernal triad from the rest of the Tree). The Golden Dawn and Crowley emphasized Daath as the gateway to the higher worlds, the place where the magician confronts the “Dweller on the Threshold”, a concept borrowed from Edward Bulwer-Lytton’s novel Zanoni (1842) and developed by the Theosophical Society. The Dweller is the personification of everything the aspirant has not faced within themselves. Crossing the Abyss through Daath means dissolving the ego.
Both traditions agree that Da’at/Daath is the point of union. The Zohar (III, 134a) describes it as the “secret of the covenant,” the place where the masculine and feminine aspects of the divine are united. In the human microcosm, Da’at corresponds to the “seat of the soul”, the faculty of discernment that allows us to know something intimately, not just intellectually.
Practitioners of Jewish Kabbalah, especially those following the Lurianic system, meditate on the sephirot as stages of divine emanation. Da’at is not counted as a separate meditation object; instead, it is the awareness that arises when the meditator has integrated the qualities of the upper three. A common practice in the Seder Haskamah (morning order) is to recite the ten sephirot and then say “Da’at” as a silent addition, acknowledging that the Tree has eleven points but only ten are revealed.
In the Hermetic Qabalah, Daath is used actively in ritual. The magician traces the path of the arrow from Keter through Daath to Tiferet, symbolizing the descent of spirit into the heart. The “dwelling” in Daath is a state of consciousness where the magician is suspended between the finite and the infinite. Crowley’s Liber 777 lists Daath as corresponding to the planet Pluto (in the modern system) and to the Atu of the Tarot called “The Aeon” (or “The Tower” in older decks). The image of the tarot card is not assigned to Daath but the path from Daath to Tiferet is associated with the Hebrew letter Tav and the card “The Universe.”
We can illustrate the difference with a concrete object: the Tree of Life diagram. In a Jewish Kabbalistic diagram, Da’at is often written in parentheses above Tiferet, or omitted entirely, with the three upper sephirot drawn as a triangle and the lower seven as a separate triangle. In a Hermetic diagram, Daath is drawn as a small circle on the central pillar, at the level of the Abyss, often with a dashed line around it to indicate its invisibility. The diagram itself encodes the theological difference.
Misconception 1: Daath and Daat are different entities. No. They are the same concept, same Hebrew word, same function. The spelling difference is purely a matter of transliteration and tradition.
Misconception 2: Daath is a “fake” sephirah. Some sources call it a “pseudo-sephirah,” but that is not dismissive. In Jewish Kabbalah, it is not numbered among the ten, but it is not fake. It is the hidden sephirah, the vessel that would be the eleventh if the Tree were extended. The Sefer Yetzirah (the Book of Formation, 2nd–6th century) counts ten sephirot, but later texts like the Pardes Rimonim of Moses Cordovero (1522–1570) treat Da’at as the eleventh when the Tree is viewed from the side of emanation.
Misconception 3: Daath is evil or associated with the Qliphoth. The Qliphoth (the “shells” or impure forces) are the unbalanced residues of the sephirot. Daath, being the point of balance, can become a gateway to the Qliphoth if the magician approaches it without preparation. The Zohar warns that the “knowledge of evil” (Da’at of the Sitra Achra) is a counterfeit of true knowledge. But Daath itself is not evil; it is the threshold.
Misconception 4: You pronounce “Daath” with a hard “th” like in “this.” The Hebrew tav is a voiceless “t” sound, but in the Golden Dawn tradition, it was often pronounced with a soft “th” (like “or” in “the”). Modern practitioners say “Da-at” (two syllables) or “Dah-ahth.” The most accurate is the Hebrew pronunciation: “dah-AHT,” with a clear glottal stop for the ayin.
FAQ
Why are there two spellings, Daath and Daat?
The spelling “Daath” comes from 19th-century Hermetic translators like Mathers, who used “th” for the Hebrew tav. “Daat” is the modern academic transliteration, closer to the Hebrew pronunciation.
Is Daath counted as a sephirah?
In Hermetic Qabalah, yes, it is the eleventh hidden sephirah. In classical Jewish Kabbalah, it is not counted among the ten but is considered the cognitive faculty that unites the three upper sephirot.
What is the Dweller on the Threshold?
It is the guardian of the Abyss, encountered when one seeks to enter Daath. It represents the sum of the aspirant’s unexamined fears and hidden desires. Passing through it requires absolute honesty.
How do you pronounce Daath in practice?
Most modern practitioners say “Da-ath” (two syllables) or “Daht.” The Hebrew pronunciation is “dah-AHT,” with a glottal stop between the two syllables.
The two spellings are not a trivial squabble over orthography. They represent two different approaches to the same mystery: the point where the finite mind touches the infinite. The Jewish Kabbalist sees Da’at as the faculty of soul that makes knowledge possible. The Hermetic magician sees Daath as the gate that must be crossed, the risk that must be taken. One is a state of being, the other an act of will.
Both are correct. The Tree of Life is a map, not the territory. Whether you write Daath or Daat, the letters are the same: dalet, ayin, tav, knowledge, the hidden eleventh, the place where the abyss opens.
If you are new to the Tree, we recommend starting with the ten sephirot as they are drawn in the Kabbalah guides, the foundation of the map. Then turn to the glossary entry for Qliphoth to understand what lies on the other side of Daath. For a deeper study of the path through the Abyss, see our guide on crossing the Abyss.
