- What Are Runes and Where Did They Come From?
- How Did Ancient Peoples Actually Use Runes?
- What Does Modern Rune Practice Look Like?
- Where Did the Rune Poems Come From and Why Do They Matter?
- How Do Divination Methods Compare?
- What Magical Practices Survived?
- What Are the Common Misconceptions?
- Do the Rune Poems Still Work for Modern Interpretation?
- The Living Thread
A Roman senator named Tacitus watched Germanic tribes cast wooden slips marked with signs onto a white cloth. He called it sortilege, a form of divination by lot. The year was 98 CE. Comparing ancient runes with modern rune practices reveals that the core structure has survived: a sacred alphabet used for writing, divination, and magic. What shifted is the medium, the audience, and the degree of systemization. Modern rune work is not a corruption of the old ways. It is a living reconstruction, built from the fragments the archaeological record left behind.
What Are Runes and Where Did They Come From?

Runes are letters of the Germanic alphabets used across Northern Europe from roughly 150 CE through the Middle Ages. The oldest known system, the Elder Futhark, contained twenty-four characters. Its younger cousin, the Younger Futhark, compressed down to sixteen during the Viking Age. The Anglo-Saxon Futhorc expanded to thirty-three or more to accommodate Old English sounds. They were cut into wood, bone, stone, and metal. They were not secret symbols hidden from the uninitiated, though the word rún in Old Norse and Old English carried undertones of mystery, whisper, and secret counsel.
The earliest known runic inscription is on the Vimose comb, a bone comb found in Denmark and dated to 160 CE. It reads harja, possibly a name or a title. By the third century, runes appear on weapons, jewelry, and memorial stones across Scandinavia and Germania. They functioned as a full writing system for ordinary messages, legal documents, and personal names. But alongside that practical use, there is strong evidence for divinatory and magical application.
Tacitus reported the casting of notae (marks) cut from a fruit-bearing tree, scattered onto a white cloth, and interpreted three times. He does not name the signs as runes, but the method matches later Nordic practice precisely. The Voluspá, an Old Norse poem preserved in the thirteenth-century Codex Regius, describes the seeress remembering “nine worlds” and “nine roots” of the world-tree, and learning runes from Odin himself. The Hávamál, stanzas 138-145, gives Odin’s own account of hanging on Yggdrasil for nine nights, wounded by a spear, to seize the runes. “I took up the runes, screaming I took them, then I fell back from there.”
That mythic origin is the hinge. Ancient practitioners understood runes as forces one could access, not letters one invented. A modern practitioner inherits that framework but applies it through a radically different lens.
How Did Ancient Peoples Actually Use Runes?

Ancient rune use falls into three distinct categories: inscription, divination, and charm.
Inscription is the easiest to verify. Thousands of runestones survive across Scandinavia, raised as memorials. The Jelling stones in Denmark, erected by King Harald Bluetooth around 965 CE, declare that he “won all of Denmark and Norway and made the Danes Christian.” The Rök runestone in Sweden, from roughly 800 CE, contains an elaborate poetic riddle about Theodoric the Great. These stones were public monuments, not occult artifacts. They faced roads and meeting places.
Divination is harder to prove textually but consistent across early accounts. The Vita Ansgari, a ninth-century biography of Saint Ansgar, describes a pagan divination by lot in Sweden where chips were shaken from a cloth. The Historia Norvegiae, from the twelfth century, mentions sæmenn who cast wooden lots. The method appears to have been simple: cut nineteen or twenty-four pieces from a branch, mark them, toss them onto a cloth, and read the pattern in which they fell. Some scholars argue that the marks were read individually, others that the pattern of the cast mattered more than the identity of each piece.
Charm and magic appear in sagas and archaeological finds. The Björketorp runestone in Blekinge, Sweden, from the seventh century, carries what is clearly a curse formula: Ate hAriwolAfz combined with invocations of ur (aurochs) and thurs (giant). The Eggjum runestone in Norway, from roughly 700 CE, includes a protective spell against fire damage using fé (wealth) and þurs (giant). The Lindholm amulet, a bone piece from Sweden dated to the third or fourth century, contains a sequence of repeated alu (ale, meaning protection or ecstasy) alongside gagaga, a sound pattern with no clear linguistic meaning.
What we never find is a systematic “rune magic” manual. No ancient text aligns the runes with colors, numbers, or exact ritual procedures. That systemization is entirely modern.
What Does Modern Rune Practice Look Like?
Modern rune practice emerged in the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, drawing from the same archaeological sources but organizing them into repeatable systems. The two most influential figures are Guido von List (1848-1919) and Ralph Blum (born 1932).
Von List, a German occultist, created the Armanen Futhark of eighteen runes in 1902, claiming it as the original “secret” runes of the Aryan priesthood. His work heavily influenced National Socialist occultism and later esoteric rune practice. It is historically unreliable but culturally significant. The Sigd, the S rune used by the Nazi SS, derives from von List’s adaptation of the sowilo rune.
Blum, an American author, published The Book of Runes in 1982. He introduced the modern practice of drawing a single rune each morning for guidance, using ceramic or stone tiles, and interpreting them through a set of “meanings” loosely derived from the Old Norse poems. Blum’s system is not historically accurate. He replaced several traditional rune names and meanings. But his books sold millions and created the template for contemporary rune reading as a daily oracle practice, parallel to tarot.
Modern rune sets almost always use the Elder Futhark of twenty-four characters, plus a blank “Odin’s rune” (Blum’s invention, not attested archaeologically). Practitioners cast them onto a cloth or draw them from a bag. They consult guidebooks that assign each rune a keyword, a reversed meaning, and sometimes a color or stone association. The Fehu rune (cattle, wealth) is interpreted as material gain or ambition. Ansuz (god, Odin) as communication or inspiration. Hagalaz (hail) as disruption or necessary change.
This is not a direct continuation of the ancient tradition. It is a modern esoteric system using ancient materials. But it does not come from nowhere.
Where Did the Rune Poems Come From and Why Do They Matter?
The three Rune Poems are the closest we have to an ancient interpretive guide. The Old English Rune Poem, preserved in a tenth-century manuscript (Cotton MS Otho B.x, burned in the Cotton Library fire of 1731 but transcribed earlier), describes each rune with a short verse. Feoh (wealth) is “a comfort to every man” but “must be shared.” Ur (aurochs) is “a fierce beast with great horns.” The poem is not a divination manual. It is a mnemonic, teaching the rune’s name, its sound, and its cultural associations.
The Old Norse Rune Poem, from thirteenth-century Iceland, and the Icelandic Rune Poem, from the fifteenth century, follow the same pattern. Fé (wealth) “is the source of discord among kinsmen.” Þurs (giant) “causes anguish to women.” These poems give us the values ancient scribes assigned to each rune. They do not tell us how to cast a layout or what a reversed rune means. That is a modern invention.
Modern practitioners who claim to work with “the original meanings” draw heavily from these poems, supplemented by the Sigrdrífumál (a section of the Poetic Edda describing runes for victory, healing, and love) and the Ljóðatal (Odin’s list of eighteen spells in the Hávamál). The result is a composite system anchored in medieval sources but reshaped for contemporary use.
How Do Divination Methods Compare?
Ancient divination, based on Tacitus and later accounts, was communal and public. A priest or chieftain cast the lots before the assembled people. The interpretation was not personal or psychological; it was oracular, intended to guide a decision about war, migration, or sacrifice. The notae were cut from a fruit-bearing tree (hazel, apple, or oak), not from prepared ceramic or stone pieces. The cloth was white, and the three-time cast suggests that the pattern itself held meaning.
Modern divination is individual, introspective, and therapeutic. A practitioner draws a single rune in the morning to frame their day. They cast three to seven runes for a question about relationships, career, or personal growth. The interpretation is subjective: what does Sowilo (sun) mean for me today? The ancient practitioner would not recognize this use. They would recognize the materials: wood slips, a white cloth, the casting motion, and the twenty-four-character set.
What is continuous is the belief that the runes are not random. Ancient practitioners saw the cast as a message from the gods or the wyrd (fate). Modern practitioners describe it as “tapping into the unconscious” or “aligning with the Norns.” The explanatory framework shifts, but the operative logic does not. The runes arrive in a particular order, and that order means something.
What Magical Practices Survived?
The ancient rune-related magic we can verify is simple and direct. Carving þurs (giant) on a weapon to strengthen it. Inscribing alu (protection) on a drinking horn. Cutting a curse formula on a stone facing the sea. The Kvinneby amulet, a copper plate found in Sweden and dated to the eleventh century, carries a protection spell invoking Thor and four runes: þ, a, u, l. This is not elaborate. It is a name and a sign.
Modern rune magic is more complex. Practitioners create bindrunes, two or more runes combined into a single symbol for a specific intent. The Vegvísir, an early modern Icelandic stave sometimes confused with a rune, appears in the Huld manuscript of 1860 but is not attested before then. Modern bindrunes are invented, not reconstructed. They work on the same principle as the ancient alu bind: overlapping shapes accumulate meaning. But the ancient evidence for bindrunes is sparse. The Vimose buckle (third century) shows three t runes bound together, a possible þr or a triple protection. The Værløse brooch (tenth century) carries a gægæ bind. These are rare.
Modern practitioners also assign colors, stones, incense, astrological correspondences, and hour observations to each rune. The Rune Gild, an organization founded by Edred Thorsson (Stephen Flowers) in 1980, teaches a full system of rune yoga, rune meditation, and rune galdr (chanting). Thorsson’s Futhark: A Handbook of Rune Magic (1984) is the definitive source for this approach. It is thoroughly modern. It is also internally consistent and widely respected in esoteric circles.
What Are the Common Misconceptions?
The most persistent error is that runes are primarily fortune-telling tools. They are not. The ancient evidence for divination is strong, but the modern oracle format is a twentieth-century invention. The runes were first and foremost a writing system. Treating them exclusively as a prophecy tool misrepresents their origin.
A second error is the belief that the blank rune is traditional. No ancient inscription, poem, or artifact includes a blank rune. It first appeared in Ralph Blum’s 1982 book. Many modern practitioners reject it as an invention. Others use it as “Odin’s rune,” representing fate or the unknown. It is a valid innovation but not a historical continuity.
A third error: that each rune has a “reversed” meaning. The ancient rune poems do not mention reversed positions. The sowilo rune, for example, is symmetrical in the Elder Futhark and cannot be reversed. The idea that a rune placed upside down indicates an opposite or blocked meaning comes from tarot divination and was introduced to rune practice in the late twentieth century.
A fourth error: that runes are inherently “Norse” or “Viking.” The Elder Futhark was used by Goths, Vandals, Angles, Saxons, and Lombards, not just Scandinavians. The Younger Futhark is what Viking Age runestones use. The Anglo-Saxon Futhorc is Anglo. The term viking runes conflates multiple alphabets across five centuries.
Do the Rune Poems Still Work for Modern Interpretation?
Yes, but they need supplementation. The Old English Rune Poem gives us Eolh (elk-sedge) as “a warrior’s protection.” The modern interpreter can build from there: protection, defense, the warrior stance. The Old Norse poem gives Tyr as “god with one hand.” Modern meanings include justice, sacrifice, and strategic loss. The poems are not a complete dictionary. They are a foundation.
Serious modern practitioners check their interpretations against the primary sources. The Sigrdrífumál describes runes for victory carved on “the hilt of the sword and the sword’s guard.” The Hávamál warns that “the staves of runes should not be cut by someone who cannot read them.” These texts confirm that rune knowledge was esoteric, meaning restricted, but not secret in the modern sense. It was specialist knowledge, like knowing how to sharpen a blade or raise a timber frame.
FAQ
Do runes have to be made of a specific wood? No. Ancient runes were cut from any fruit-bearing tree: hazel, apple, oak. Modern practitioners often use birch, ash, or fruitwood. The material matters less than the intention and the surface.
Can you use runes for curse or hex work? Yes, and this is one area where ancient and modern overlap directly. The Björketorp stone and several shield-mount inscriptions carry curse formulas. Modern practice treats curse runes as a specialty of the þurs (giant) and hagalaz (hail) runes.
Are runes related to the Tarot? No historical connection exists. The runes and the tarot developed in separate regions and periods. Modern practitioners occasionally assign tarot correspondences to runes, but this is a syncretic practice, not a historical truth.
Do you need to recite the Hávamál while carving runes? No. The Hávamál describes Odin’s initiatory ordeal, not a required ritual. Reciting the poem can be a meditative act, but it is not mandatory.
The Living Thread
Ancient rune users did not write “rune magic” handbooks. They carved alu on a belt buckle and trusted that it worked. Modern practitioners write pages on whether Ehwaz (horse) means travel or trust, and they are not wrong to do so. The runes survived because they were useful for writing, not because they were magic. That the Elder Futhark now serves as a twenty-four key oracle system is a reclamation, not an invention.
For a full breakdown of each character, start with the runes vertical hub. For the distinction between the three major futharks, see our guide on the Elder versus Younger Futhark. And for the primary sources themselves, the Sirgrdrífumál glossary entry gives the surviving stanzas in translation.
